Bimla Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7850 of 2023 ====================================================== Bimla Devi Wife of Ram Sumer Singh, Resident of Village- Padaria, Ward no. 08, P.S.- Baghaila, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram namely Sri Pankaj Dixit. 4.

The District Programme Officer, District Programme Section, I.C.D.S Rohtas at Sasaram namely Sunita Kumari.

5.

The Child Development Project Officer Rajpur, District- Rohtas, namely, Smt. Munni Devi.

6.

Smt. Tijamani Devi, the Lady Observer cum Secretary Selection Committee, Anganbari Kendra No.66, of village and Panchayat- Podaria, P.S.- Baghaila, Rajpur, District- Rohtas.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prashant Pratap (Gp2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of writ in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order for direction commanding the Respondents to implement the order dated 11.10.2022 passed by District Programme Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram in Appeal Vaad Sankhya- 2020 (Smt. Bimla Devi wife of Sri Ramsumer Singh, Village Padariya, Ward no.03, Thana -Baghaila, Prakhand-Rajpur,

Patna High Court CWJC No.7850 of 2023(2) dt.28-11-2023 2/2 District- Rohtas.. Appellants. V/S Smt. Gayatri Kumari wife of Sri Rambharosa Gupta, Gram Padaria, Ward no.08, Kendra Sankhya-66, Thana -Baghaila, Prakhand Rajpur, DistrictRohtas.. Opposite Party) and other relief/reliefs which deemed to be entitled."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U