← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4710/2015disposed

Gorak Nandan Vishwakarma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-04-18Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4710 of 2015 ====================================================== Gorak Nandan Vishwakarma son of Late Ram Nath Vishwakarma, resident of Shoshila Bhawan B, 59, Birla Colony Phulwarisharif, Police StationPhulwarisharif, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Finance Department , Government of India, New Delhi.

3.

The Deputy Chief Officer, Reserve Bank of India, Department of India, Department of Banking Operation 4.

The Manager Reserve Bank of India, Patna South of Gandhi Maidan Patna Town and District- Patna.

5.

The Zonal Manager, Panjab National Bank, R. Block, Chanakya Place, Patna-1 6.

The Deputy, Zonal Manager, Panjab National Bank, R. Block, Chanakya Place, Patna-1 7.

The Secretary, Institutional Finance and Programme Implementation Department, Government of Bihar, ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP-6 For the PNB : Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 18-04-2019 The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is indecisiveness on the part of the respondent Bank on the representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-10). Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank submits that the writ application may be disposed of with a direction to the Bank that the Bank will consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate

Patna High Court CWJC No.4710 of 2015(4) dt.18-04-2019 2/2 order within a reasonable time.

Considering the aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Bank to take appropriate decision, if not already taken, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U