Kongress Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32428 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2022 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.
Kongress Yadav S/o Late Dhanu Yadav R/o Village - Simratari, P.S - Chakai, District - Jamui 2.
Ranjit Yadav @ Shobhan Yadav S/o Roshan Yadav R/o Village - Simmratari, P.S - Chakai, District - Jamui 3.
Tetu Yadav S/o Roshan Yadav R/o Village - Simratari, P.S - Chakai, District - Jamui 4.
Kinu Yadav @ Kinu Mahto S/o Maharaj @ Maharaj Mahto R/o Village - Simratari, P.S - Chakai, District - Jamui 5.
Raushan Yadav S/o Late Prayag Mahto R/o Village - Simratari, P.S - Chakai, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 427, 379, 404 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, on 01.08.2022, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came to the house of informant and assaulted informant and his family members.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32428 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. On account of land dispute between the parties, a free-fight took place in which both sides sustained injuries. The present case is counter-blast of Chandramandih P.S. Cae No. 138 of 2022 which was lodged earlier in point of time by the petitioners' side against informant and others and in retaliation and only with a view to save their skin from the aforesaid case, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32428 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026 3/3 petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Chandramandih P.S. Case No. 139 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T