Veena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32748 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-517 Year-2021 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Veena Devi Wife Of Sri Ashok Singh Resident Of Village- Bihat Gurudaspur Tola (WRONGLY Written In The F.I.R. At Rahatpur), P.S. Barauni, DistrictBegusarai. 2.

Ashok Singh Son Of Late Kapildeo Singh Resident Of Village- Bihat Gurudaspur Tola, (WRONGLY Written F.I.R. At Rahatpur), P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 304(B), 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Petitioners along with other co-accused is said to have killed the daughter of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32748 of 2022(4) dt.02-11-2022 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioners are in laws of the deceased. He submits that husband has already surrendered on 01.11.2022. He further submits that petitioner no.1 has no criminal antecedent and petitioner no.2 has one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners and husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barauni (F.C.I.) P.S. Case No. 517 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T