Md. Tawarak @ Md. Tabarak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66936 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2017 Thana- NAANPUR DistrictSitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Tawarak @ Md. Tabarak Son of Md. Manir Resident of VillageHarinagar, Police Station-Nanpur,Distt.-Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 448, 341, 323, 354, 457, 380, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of petty dispute between the parties relating to a road as the parties are neighbours. There is inordinate delay in lodging of F.I.R. on 06.01.2017 for the alleged occurrence of 24.12.2016. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66936 of 2018(2) dt.03-01-2019 2/2 weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (Pupri), Sitamarhi in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar/ U U