Rani Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35116 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2022 Thana- HABIBPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Rani Devi Wife of Uchit Yadav Resident of Village- Navtoliya Shahjangi, P.SHabibpur, Dist- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Shekhar Sharma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection Habibpur P.S. Case No.181 of 2022 dated 09.11.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 302, 506/34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the coaccused persons are alleged to have indulged in hatching conspiracy to commit murder of the informant's mother in connivance with the other co-accused persons Ram Bilash Yadav and Ravi Yadav who shot the informant's mother dead.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no eye witness in this case. The petitioner is made accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35116 of 2024(2) dt.02-08-2024 2/2 in this case only on the basis of mere suspicion. The specific allegation of firing is against the co-accused persons, Ravi Yadav and Ram Bilash Yadav. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 07.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36442 of 2023. There is general and omnibus allegastion against the petitioner. The petitioner is a lady and she has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of her arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Bhagalpur, in connection with Habibpur P.S Case No. 181 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T