Jay Kumar @ Bablu Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31664 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2020 Thana- KAHALGAON District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Jay Kumar @ Bablu Mandal, Son of Chandra Shekhar Mandal, Resident of Village - Pannuchak, P.S.- Ghogha, (Kahalgaon), Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Atul Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2020 In view of the submission and undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, at the time of hearing of this application through Video Conferencing, that he would remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the stamp reporter, within two weeks of starting of the Court proceeding in physical mode, he is permitted to remove the same accordingly.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State through Video Conferencing. The petitioner is accused in connection with Kahalgaon (Ghogha) P.S. Case No. 185 of 2020, registered under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 37(C) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016.

The accusation is that petitioner being the husband of the informant, Pushpa Devi, used to torture and caused assault to her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31664 of 2020(2) dt.02-12-2020 2/2 in drunken condition, while informant tried to convince her husband, Jai Kumar Mandal (petitioner) but petitioner used to give threatening of dire consequences and her husband (petitioner) also sold the land. Anyhow, informant managed to maintain her five children. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, admittedly, petitioner is the husband of the informant. The petitioner sold some land for need in spite of protest of his wife (informant) due to that reason, the present case has been lodged with false allegation. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 17.03.2020.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge Excise, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kahalgaon (Ghogha) P.S. Case No. 185 of 2020. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T