← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7414/2016disposed

Usha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-04-23Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7414 of 2016 ====================================================== Usha Kumari daughter of Shri Sukhdeo Singh resident of village Patkauriya, Police Station Chanpatia, District West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah.

2.

The District Education Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah. 3.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, West Champaran at Bettiah. 4.

The Block Development Officer, Yogapatti, West Champaran at Bettiah. 5.

The Block Education Officer, Yogapatti, West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeet Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Priyadarshi Matrisharan, AC toi AAG 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned. 2.

The petitioner, being aggrieved by letter no. 595 dated 18.03.2016, issued by Block Development Officer, Yogapatti, West Champaran, by which, the services of the petitioner has been terminated, directly approached this Court, without approaching the District Appellate Authority. 3.

In view of the nature of dispute, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the District Appellate Authority, West Champaran at Bettiah, by filing an appeal, against the order dated 18.03.2016, passed by Block Development Officer, Yogapatti, West Champaran.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7414 of 2016(4) dt.23-04-2024 2/2 4.

It is made clear that if an appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, along with a petition for condonation of delay, the District Teachers Appellate Authority, West Champaran at Bettiah shall consider the same and pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the person(s) concerned.

5.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ application is disposed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) rinkee/- U