← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2344/2023allowed

Md. Arman @ Md. Akrot @ Sadare Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-14Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2344 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2022 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Arman @ Md. Akrot @ Sadare Alam Son Of Md. Akram Resident Of Village- Ijara, Ps- Rahika, Distt- Madhubani ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ram Prakash Paswan Son Of Late Rajendra Paswan Resident Of VillageRajoura Dih, Ps- Raiyam, Distt- Darbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Ms.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P for the State.

The appellant has challenged the order dated 12.04.2023 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC & ST Act, Madhubani in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 172 of 2022 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354(B), 379, 384, 385, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r) (s), W(i), W(ii), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act whereby his prayer for being released on bail has been rejected.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2344 of 2023(5) dt.14-09-2023 2/3 As per allegation in the F.I.R, all the F.I.R named accused persons including the appellant along with 15-20 unknown persons have assaulted the informant and while assaulting, they were uttering chorchor. The accused persons also abused the informant by calling his caste name.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the appellant. As per F.I.R, the provisions under SC/ST would not be attracted against the appellant. Moreover, other similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.05.2022 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 4395 of 2022. The appellant is in custody since 19.02.2023. Learned Special P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and submitted that informant was brutally

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2344 of 2023(5) dt.14-09-2023 3/3 assaulted by the accused persons including the appellant.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court deems it appropriate to set aside the order dated 12.04.2023.

Accordingly, this appeal is allowed.

The appellant, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Madhubani in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 172 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T