← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3076/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Dil Kishore Singh Gautam v. The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authourity And ORS

2023-10-03Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3076 of 2016 ====================================================== Dil Kishore Singh Gautam S/o Laet Rameshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of village- Naya Panapur, P.O.- Manas Panapur, P.S.- Akilpur Danapur, DistrictPatna, at presently residing C/o Ravindra Rai, Digha Public School, Nahar Road, Ramji Chak, P.O.- Bata, Patna, Prpprietor of Sainik Soap Udyog, Industrial Area, Fatuha, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authourity through its Managing Director, 6-7 Floor, Indira Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna now shifted at East Gandhi Maidan, 1st Floor, Indira Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

The Managing Director, BIADA, 6-7 Floor, Indira Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna now shifted at East Gandhi Maidan, 1st Floor, Indira Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Executive Director, BIADA, 6-7 Floor, Indira Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna now shifted at East Gandhi Maidan, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Patna. 4.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna through its Managing Director.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh, AC to GA-10.

For the BIADA :

Mr. Girijish Kumar, Adv.

For the BSFC :

Mr. Rajnandan Prasad, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 03-10-2023 Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The matter was earlier listed on 17.08.2023 and 18.09.2023, on which dates there were also no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3076 of 2016(6) dt.03-10-2023 2/2

3. Today the matter is listed under the heading "For Orders" but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition.

5. The present Writ Petition, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) shakir/- U