Jharkhandi Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70619 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2002 Thana- AKILPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Jharkhandi Rai Son of Late Ramrup Rai 2.

Hare Ram Rai, Son of Satyanand Rai Both are R/o- Khedalpura, P.S.- Akhilpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ghanshyam Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Danapur ;(Akilpur) P.S.Case no.354 of 2002 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with the several other accused persons armed with various arms came to the Darwaza of the informant and there is specific allegation against Jagdish Rai and Rajendra Rai that they fired causing injury to Sipahi Rai and Dipti Rai and both of them succumbed to the injuries.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they are named in the FIR but nothing specific has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70619 of 2018(5) dt.10-04-2019 2/2 attributed against them.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Danapur in connection with Danapur (Akilpur) P.S.Case No.354 of 2002, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T