Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43103/2021bail rejected

Chandramani Singh @ Paisa Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-22Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43103 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2021 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar ====================================================== CHANDRAMANI SINGH @ PAISA SINGH S/O GANESH YADAV R/O VILLAGE-JITWADIH, P.S.- NAWANAGAR, DISTRICT-BUXAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mohit Shriwastava For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-10-2021 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID - 19 pandemic restrictions.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 113 of 2021 for the offence registered under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Amendment Act, 2018.

The prosecution case in brief is that about 79 litres and 740 ml illicit English liquor has been recovered from his house and the seizure list corroborated the same.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43103 of 2021(2) dt.22-10-2021 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the State resists the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that during the course of search 79 litres and 740 ml illicit English liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner, as such, it is not a fit case for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. It is accordingly, rejected.

However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and files an application for regular bail on which the Court below shall pass necessary in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the present order. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Jagdish/- U T