Kundan Bind @ Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36224 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2024 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.
Kundan Bind @ Kundan Kumar Son Of Umesh Bind Resident Of Village - Bharigawan, P.S. - Kudra, District - Kaimur At Bhabhua 2.
Ratan Bind @ Ratan Kumar Son Of Umesh Bind Resident Of Village - Bharigawan, P.S. - Kudra, District - Kaimur At Bhabhua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State along with learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to land and the petitioners are related to the husband of the informant. It is further submitted that the informant alleges that she was assaulted by Ratan by pestle on head while Kundan assaulted her husband by rammi causing injury on head and Umesh snatched
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36224 of 2024(2) dt.19-06-2024 2/2 Rs.25000/- from the pocket of her husband. It is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to land an altercation had taken place on which both sides assaulted each other. It is also submitted that the blow was not repeated and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, which amply demonstrates that the petitioners never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State along with learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No.117/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T