← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14860/2017dismissed

Suresh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2021-03-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14860 of 2017 ====================================================== Suresh Kumar Singh Son of Uma Kant Singh, Resident of Village Digghi, Police Station Murliganj, District Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 2.

The State Appellate Authority, Patna.

3.

The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Madhepura. 4.

The Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Madhepura.

5.

The District Education Officer, Madhepura.

6.

The Block Development Officer, Murliganj, District Madhepura. 7.

The Block Education Extension Officer, Murliganj, District Madhepura. 8.

Mohan Kumar Singh, son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad Singh, resident of Village Dhabauli, Police Station Saur Bazar, District Saharsa, presently posted at Block Teacher, Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Sakhua, Police Station Murliganj, District- Madhepura.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Madheshwar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Usha Kumari Singh, AC to SC13 For Respondent no.8 :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 08-03-2021 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

Pursuant to the order dated 17.07.2019, respondent no. 8 was examined by the Expert Committee of the Doctors of the Patna Medical College & Hospital.

Perused the report of the Expert Committee of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.14860 of 2017(4) dt.08-03-2021 2/2 Doctors of the Patna Medical College & Hospital. The report of the Medical Board is kept on record. The present report tallies with the previous report.

In view of the above report, the Court does not find any merit in the writ application.

The writ application is dismissed as devoid of any merit.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U