Sadanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5086 of 2015 ====================================================== Sadanand Yadav Son of Kamal Prasad Yadav. Resident of village - Kawiya, P.S.- K.Hat, Post Office - Harda, District - Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Collector, Purnea 2.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Purnea.

3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reform, Sadar, Purnea. 4.

The Assistant Consolidation Officer, Purnea.

5.

The Circle Officer, Purnea East, Purnea.

6.

The Anchal Amin, Purnea East, Purnea.

7.

The Circle Inspector Purnea East, Purnea.

8.

The Halka Karmachari No.3, Purnea East, Purnea. 9.

Chatri Rishi. Son of Late Sukhash Rishi. Resident of village - Harda, Post Office - Harda, P.S.- K.Hat, Dist.- Purnea.

10.

Phatkan Rishi. Son of Baso Rishi. Resident of village - Harda, Post Office - Harda, P.S.- K.Hat, Dist.- Purnea.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Harshwardhan Sahay, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For quashing parwana as contained in Annexure-6 of writ application whereby and whereunder Land Settlement Parwana has been issued to Respondents no. 9 and 10.

(ii). For restraining respondents from taking possession and demolishing the house and land of the petitioner."

Patna High Court CWJC No.5086 of 2015(3) dt.31-07-2024 2/2 2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the RespondentState submits, by referring to paragraph no. 12 of the counter affidavit, filed on behalf of the Respondents No. 1 to 8 that the Respondents have got nothing to do with plot, appertaining to Chak Khesra no. 178, upon which the houses of the petitioner has been constructed, however, they are only removing the encroachment made over Plot No. 177, which is reserved for Scheduled Caste and landless labourers and settled with the private Respondents No. 9 and 10 under the Dakhal Dehani Scheme.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Respondents be directed to conduct measurement of the aforesaid plot in question i.e. the one appertaining to Chak Khesra No. 178, situated at Mauza- Eraji Gangeli, District-Purnea and demarcate the same so that he is not harassed from time to time. It is directed accordingly. 4.

The present writ petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U