← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38119/2014dismissed

Sanjay Kumar @ Shanjay Sharma @ Lala v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38119 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -333 Year- 2013 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Sanjay Kumar @ Shanjay Sharma @ Lala Son of Krishna Sharma resident of village- Sonbhadra, Police Station- Karpi, District- Arwal, at Present Mohalla- Indira Nagar, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2015 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 18.02.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49097 of 2013.

Petitioner appears to be sole assailant of the deceased, therefore, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly the same is rejected.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charges were framed on 13.01.2014 but till date not a single prosecution witness has been examined. The Session Trial No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38119 of 2014 (3) dt.21-01-2015 2/2 540 of 2013 is pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Vaishali at Hajipur. The trial court is directed to make all efforts and conclude the trial within one year from the date of production of a copy of this order. Learned counsel for the informant is also present in court. Learned counsel undertakes to produce the witness. The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali is directed to produce the prosecution witness in court on the date fixed for evidence so that the trial may conclude within one year from the date of production of a copy of this order. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) M.Rahman/- U T