Dilip Kumar Tatma @ Dilip Tatma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33323 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2023 Thana- KURSAKANTA District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

DILIP KUMAR TATMA @ DILIP TATMA Son of Kanaklal Tatma @ Kanik Lal Tatma Resident of village - Siktiya, ward no. 6, P.S. - Kursakanta (Sonamani Godam O.P.), Distt. - Araria 2.

Arbind Kumar Tatma Son of Kanaklal Tatma @ Kanik Lal Tatma Resident of village - Siktiya, ward no. 6, P.S. - Kursakanta (Sonamani Godam O.P.), Distt. - Araria 3.

Dewanti Devi Wife of Dilip Kumar Tatma @ Dilip Tatma Resident of village - Rajauli, ward no. 5, P.S. - Kursakanta (Sonamani Godam O.P.), Distt. - Araria 4.

Pushpa Devi @ Pushpa Kumari Wife of Arbind Kumar Tatma Resident of village - Rajauli, ward no. 5, P.S. - Kursakanta (Sonamani Godam O.P.), Distt. - Araria 5.

Kanaklal Tatma @ Kanil Lal Tatma Son of Jattu Tatma Resident of village - Siktiya, ward no. 6, P.S. - Kursakanta (Sonamani Godam O.P.), Distt. - Araria 6.

Sanjheli Devi @ Sajli Devi @ Sinjhli Devi Wife of Gulab Chand Tatma Resident of village - Rajauli, ward no. 5, P.S. - Kursakanta (Sonamani Godam O.P.), Distt. - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akbar Ali , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 363 , 365 , 366(A) , 323 , 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against these petitioners is that they

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33323 of 2023(4) dt.21-09-2023 2/2 kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant with the intention to solemnize marriage .

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that victim in her statement under section 164 Cr. P . C . has denied prosecution case and stated that after being reprimanded by her mother, she left her house and went to the house of Mausi. No one has kidnapped her.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition.

6 Considering the statement of the victim under section 164 Cr. P . C . and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A . C . J . M. 1st, Araria in connection with Kursakanta P.S. Case No. 57 of 2023 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Kaushik/- U T