Satyendra Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.74878 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-893 Year-2015 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Satyendra Singh @ Satyendra Kumar Singh, S/o Rameshwar Prasad Singh @ Rameshwar Singh, R/o Village- Rupahtha, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sasaram Model P.S. Case No.893 of 2015 registered for the offences under Sections 448, 353, 384 and 504 of IPC. The case has been registered on the basis of written report of District Agriculture Officer, Sasaram. As per F.I.R., this petitioner entered into the office of informant and asked for two trucks urea fertilizer and began to throw papers kept on table. When the co-ordinator intervened, he was also misbehaved by the petitioner. It appears that the anticipatory bail prayer was rejected vide order dated 04.05.2018 passed in A.B.P. No.817 of 2018. On perusal of said order, it appears that the petitioner in compliance of notice under Section 41(A) of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74878 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2 Cr.P.C. appeared before the police and he was released. It further appears that the police have submitted charge sheet. The learned court below has taken cognizance of offence and issued summons for appearance of the petitioner.

In view of above fact, this application stands disposed of with an observation that if the petitioner appears before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned court within six weeks from today, the concerned court shall consider his prayer for bail keeping in view the well established principle that a person who is already on bail shall not be denied such privilege unless there is any allegation of misuse etc. (Sanjay Kumar, J) Harish/- U