← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6108/2016dismissed

Satyendra Singh And ORS v. The Chairman Cum Managing Director Power Grid Corporation India Ltd. And ORS

2023-08-29Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6108 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Satyendra Singh and Ors son of Late Anandi Singh resident of village Bahuara, P.S. Gaurichak, District Patna.

2.

Ajay Kumar son of Late Kedarnath Singh resident of village Bahuara, P.S. Gaurichak, District Patna.

3.

Om Prakash Singh son of Sri Parashnath Singh resident of village Bahuara, P.S. Gaurichak, District Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Chairman Cum Managing Director Power Grid Corporation India Ltd. and Ors 2.

The A.G.M. Unit Officer, Power Grid Corporation on India Alankar Palace, Boring Road, Patna - 80000 3.

The Chief Manager LTC, Power Grid Corporation of India Alankar Palace, Boring Road, Patna - 800001 4.

The Chief Vigilance Officer, Power Grid Corporation India Ltd., Corporate Center Sandamini plot - 2 5.

The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. Off Bailey Road, Patna. 6.

The Project Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Patna Khagaul Transmission Line, Alankar Palac 7.

The Chairman, Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited through its Secretary having its office at B 8.

The State of Bihar through its District Magistrate, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Prasad Singh, Adv.

For Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 & 6 Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gp12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 29-08-2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed and nothing survives in the present writ petition to be adjudicated upon.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6108 of 2016(6) dt.29-08-2023 2/2

2. Having regard to the same, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (A. Abhishek Reddy, J) Ayush/- U