Ram Paswan @ Ram Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32802 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2018 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Ram Paswan @ Ram Kumar Paswan, male, aged about 22 years, S/o Sakhichan Paswan R/o village- Mohna, P.S.- Rajoun, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satya Veer, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 418 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 363, 365, 34, 38 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation has been made against the petitioner of taking away the wife of the Informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is the dispute between the wife and the husband and earlier also she has left the house of the Informant.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32802 of 2020(2) dt.05-03-2021 2/2 from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 418 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is repeats the similar offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T