Mutur Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33180 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2021 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Mutur Rai Son Of Late Dalgira Rai Resident Of Village- Pachrukhiya, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur.

2.

Fakira Nat @ Fakir Nat Son Of Nabi Nat Resident Of Village- Pachrukhiya, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition Excise Act, 2018.

It is a case of recovery of liquor from the house of the petitioners.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioners have clean antecedents.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33180 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 2/2 After considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U