Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32999 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-353 Year-2018 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Mahto Son of Phulan Mahto Resident of Village - Mahto Mushehari, P.S.- Chapra Mufassil, Dist.- Saran. 2.
Rahul Mahto Son of Surendra Mahto Resident of Village - Mahto Mushehari, P.S.- Chapra Mufassil, Dist.- Saran. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S.Case No. 353 of 2018 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the submission that there is case and counter case and for an occurrence, which took place on 09.08.2018, fardbeyan was recorded on 10.08.2018 and the FIR was registered after almost six months on 18.02.2019 as also that two other co-accused, namely, Jhulan Mahto @ Phulan Mahto and Ravindra Mahto have already been granted pre-arrest bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.03.2019
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32999 of 2019(2) dt.20-05-2019 2/2 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 3786 of 2019, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 353 of 2018, subject to the conditions :
(a) that the petitioners shall attend court in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed;
(b) that the petitioners shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of the present case; and (c) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- U T