Sunil Rajvanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35258 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2020 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Sunil Rajvanshi Son Of Sitaram Rajvanshi Resident Of Village - Thakur Sthan, Rajgir, Police Station - Rajgir, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Newada P.S. Case No. 212 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395/397 of the I.P.C. and Sections 25(1-b)a/26/27 of Arms Act.

3. As per allegation, on 04.03.2020 when the informant was sleeping in his house along with his family members, petitioner along with 7-8 unknown persons entered into the house equipped with weapons and they snatched the gold chain and earrings from the person of daughter-in-law of the informant. They committed lootpat after making captive the inmates of the house.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35258 of 2024(2) dt.10-05-2024 2/2 has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits further that nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. His name has figured in confessional statement of Sonu @ Md Zafar who has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 8145 of 2021 vide order dated 23.06.2021. He further submits that the case of the petitioner is on better footing as of Sonu @ Md. Zafar.

5. On the other hand, Shri Shailendra Kumar, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances especially the fact that the co-accused in whose confessional statement the name of the petitioner has figured has been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court and on similar footing some other accused have also been granter bail, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Newada P.S. Case No. 212 of 2020. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Sudha/- U T