Rajiv Singh @ Rajiv Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33031 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1612 Year-2014 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ====================================================== 1.

Rajiv Singh @ Rajiv Ranjan Son Of Harendra Singh Resident Of VillageBasantpur, P.S.- Panapur, District- Saran. 2.

Radheyshyam Singh Son Of Surendra Singh Resident Of VillageBasahiyan, P.S.- Panapur, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

Ruman Devi Wife Of Dilip Kumar Resident Of Village- Chakiya, P.S.- Panapur, District- Saran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shatrughan Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1612/2014 (Tr. No.412/15), registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 380, 427, 504 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that on the order of co-accused, Binod Ram, the petitioners demolished the newly constructed house, old house, boundary, lavatory etc. with J.C.B. Machine and other accused persons looted the entire household articles. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33031 of 2022(3) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 present case. It is submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that petitioner no.1 is driver and petitioner no.2 is owner of J.C.B. It is submitted that out of 14 persons named in the present case, 12 persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below itself. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing the bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chapra in connection with Complaint Case No.1612/2014 (Tr. No.412/15), subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T