Ali Baks Anwar @ Chunnu Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31813 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2025 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ali Baks Anwar @ Chunnu Ansari Son of Jabbar Ali @ Javar Ali Resident of Areraj Behind Hall Ward No. 9, P.S.- Areraj, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State (through virtual mode).

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and 25(1-a), a 26, 35 of Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police has input that some miscreants have gathered for committing murder of one Vijay Yadav and his associates. The petitioner along with two others was apprehended. It is alleged that from possessions of co-accused, arms were recovered. From the possession of this petitioner, only a mobile was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31813 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/2 the perusal of the FIR, it is clear that petitioner was merely present and was apprehended. Nothing was recovered from his possession. It has further been submitted that similarly situated co-accused Ashutosh Kumar has already been granted bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. Nol. 9059 of 2026. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 18.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sadar at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Banjariya P.S. Case No. 580 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Lata/- Nitu/- U T