← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16392/2016disposed

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Pd. Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-02-21Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16392 of 2016 ====================================================== Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Pd. Yadav Son of Late Jamuna Yadav Resident of Village- Bhauram Tola, P.O. and P.S.- Kharagpur, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary , Water Resource Department , Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Engineer -in -Chief -cum-Additional Secretary, Water Resource Department , Government of Bihar,

4. The Chief Enginner Irrigation Creation, Water Resource Department , Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The Superintending Engineer, Water Resource Department , Irrigation Circle, Kharagpur, District- Munger

6. The Executive Engineer , Water Resource Department , Irrigation Division, Tarapur, District-Munger ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Harish Kumar-Gp8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-02-2019 After some argument it is pointed out by the petitioner's Counsel that considering the petitioner to be a Truck Driver in Grade III the respondents have not considered his claim for regularisation on Grade IV post in the Water Resources Department at Bhagalpur. The petitioner was therefore not extended the benefit of Government Resolution dated 16.3.2006 bearing Memo No. 639.

The action of non consideration of petitioner's claim for regularisation on Class IV therefore cannot be faulted with. The respondents were considering the petitioner to be an

Patna High Court CWJC No.16392 of 2016(4) dt.21-02-2019 2/2 employee in Class III on daily wages as Truck Driver. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this Court would only observe that as and when procedure is undertaken for appointment of Truck Drivers on Class III posts the petitioner's claim would be considered in accordance with law having regard to his past services.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J.) SNkumar/- U