← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65917/2018bail granted

Laddu Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-30Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65917 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2018 Thana- ARIYARI District- Sheikhpura ======================================================

1. Laddu Yadav

2. Bosu Yadav Both sons of Bachchan Yadav, r/o- village Sumka, P.S.- Ariyari (Kasar), District- Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-10-2018 Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph no. 1 of the application in course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution case, in short, is that 4 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The names of the petitioners have transpired as the alleged recovery is made from the joint houses of the petitioners where the other family members

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65917 of 2018(2) dt.30-10-2018 2/2 also reside. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that 4 liters wine is recovered from joint house of the petitioners. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura in connection with Excise Case No. 237/18 arising out of Ariyari (Kasar) P.S. Case No. 165/18), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T