Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32295/2020rejected

Amzad Ali Alias Mantu v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-06Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32295 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2020 Thana- DIGHALBANK District- Kishanganj ====================================================== AMZAD ALI ALIAS MANTU S/o Late Md. Naushad Ali @ Noushad Alam R/o Village- Hajipur, P.S.- Dighalbank, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for regular bail arises out of Dighalbank P.S. Case No. 57 of 2020, disclosing the offence punishable under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR is registered against unknown with the allegation that in the midnight of the alleged date of occurrence criminals entered into the house of the informant and after captivating the informant and his wife they looted away cash, jewelleries and other valuables. During course of investigation, name of the petitioner and other persons surfaced. The petitioner's name surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of a co-accused. The petitioner also confessed his involvement in commission of the offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32295 of 2020(5) dt.06-01-2021 2/2 On perusal of the case diary, it appears that a vivid description of the manner of commission of offence was disclosed by the persons whose names had surfaced during the investigation. It transpires from the case diary that the petitioner has been found to be member of a gang engaged in commission of serous offences of similar nature.

In the aforesaid background, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail for the present This application is accordingly rejected.

The petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months, if, in the meanwhile, charge is not framed against him.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Rajesh/- U T