Saroj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32020 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Saran ====================================================== Saroj Kumar Yadav Son of Doman Rai Resident of Village - Belwaniya, P.S. - Garkha, Dist - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Pronoti Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2020 Learned counsel of the petitioner assures this court that he shall remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks from the date when the court starts physical function.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State through video conference.

Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 12.07.2020 in connection with Excise Case No. 121 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar (Prohibition) and Excise Act, 2018.

60 litre country made liquor is said to have been recovered while the same was being carried by the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32020 of 2020(2) dt.08-12-2020 2/2 and one co-accused on a motorcycle. Petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail provisionally till removal of the defects, as pointed out by the office, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Excise Court, Saran at Chapra in connection with Excise Case No. 121 of 2020. It is made clear that if the defects, as pointed out by the office, are removed within the above stated period, the provisional bail of the petitioner shall be deemed to be confirmed.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) shahzad/- U T