← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35578/2024bail granted

Brajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-26Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35578 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-368 Year-2023 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Brajesh Kumar SON OF Dev Narayan Mahto R/O Village- Sakrauli, Chharrapatti, P.S.- Cheriya Bariyarpur, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a place near Rampur Ghat Chharrapatti bamboo clamp.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of the Chawkidar. It is further submitted that the police in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35578 of 2024(3) dt.26-07-2024 2/2 mechanical manner implicate either at the instance of the Chawkidar or local person but then it is submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that how the Chawkidar identified the petitioner when petitioner is not known to him.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 368 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. However, the learned trial court, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner, shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T