← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33132/2022bail granted

Mahadeo Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-14Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33132 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2022 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Mahadeo Mahto Son of Taj Narayan Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

2.

Ravin Mahto Son of Taj Narayan Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

3.

Janak Mahto Son of Safi Lal Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

4.

Guni Lal Mahto Son of Janglee Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

5.

Pappu Mahto Son of Safi Lal Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

6.

Dinesh Mahto Son of Babu Lal Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

7.

Jalim Mahto @ Jal Mahto Son of Laxmi Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

8.

Moti Mahto Son of Taj Narayan Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

9.

Dhirendra Mahto @ Dhiren Mahto Son of Tej Narayan Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea. 10.

Tanukee Mahto @ Tanukee Kumar Mahto Son of Sheo Narayan Mahto Resident of Village - Satimi Bind Toli, P.s.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33132 of 2022(2) dt.14-11-2022 2/2 As per the prosecution case, all the FIR named accused persons including petitioners armed with deadly weapons assaulted the informant and others with lathi, danda and iron rod, as a result of which three persons sustained injuries.

It is submitted that free fight took place between the parties on a petty dispute, as a consequence whereof both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case. Case lodged by petitioners is earlier in point of time. Injuries sustained by injured are simple in nature except one injury. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners abovenamed, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 4, Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 45 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T