Vivekanand Pathak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15510 of 2017 ====================================================== Vivekanand Pathak son of Late Gangadhar Pathak resident of Ward No. 7, Bajrang Bagh, Hilsa, P.S. - Hilsa, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Special Director Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Nalanda. 5.

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna through its Secretary. 6.

The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 7.

The Secretary, Managing Committee, Smt. Munakka Devi Sanskrit High School, Kamta, Hilsa, Nalanda.

8.

The Headmaster, Smt. Munakka Devi Sanskrit High School, Kamta, Hilsa, Nalanda.

9.

Rajnish Kumar son of Late Vijendra Singh resident of village - Bishambharpur, Police Station - Bikram, District - Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha, Adv.

: Mr. Murari Prasad Sinha,Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey-AAG-15 : Mr. Shshsi Shekhar Tiwary, AC to AAG-15 For the BSSB : Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, Adv.

: Mr. Ram Niwas Prasad, Adv.

For Respondent No.8 : Mr. Shashi Kr. Jha, Adv.

For Respondent No.9 : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2025 Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.8, private respondent No.9 and learned counsel for Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board (BSSB) as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State are present.

2. Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, learned junior counsel to

Patna High Court CWJC No.15510 of 2017(12) dt.20-11-2025 2/2 Mr. Murari Prasad Sinha, appears for the petitioner and submits that he is under instruction to withdraw the present writ application, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.

3. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.

4. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) brajesh/- U