Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31317/2019bail granted

Chandramani Devi @ Sulekha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-10Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31317 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2017 Thana- MAHKAR District- Gaya ====================================================== Chandramani Devi @ Sulekha Devi Wife of Bhushan Yadav Resident of Village - Jagadiha, P.S.- Mahakar, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504/34 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

The male and female members of the family allegedly assaulted to the informant and his father later on father died. Co-accused Daulity Devi has been allowed anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14465 of 2019. Petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2019. Investigation of the case is complete. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31317 of 2019(2) dt.10-05-2019 2/2 Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Mahkar P.S. Case No. 174 of 2017, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below having immovable property.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) Banti/Rajan U T