Multani Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32560 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2019 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Multani Singh Son Of Bimal Singh Resident Of Village- Gokhula, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali.

2.

Yaduni Singh Son Of Bimal Singh Resident Of Village- Gokhula, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali.

3.

Bambam Kumar Son Of Yaduni Singh Resident Of Village- Gokhula, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-09-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 2 has been arrested by the police, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this application with regard to petitioner no. 2.

Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with regard to petitioner no. 2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State for consideration of bail with regard to rest of the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32560 of 2022(2) dt.15-09-2022 2/3 non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 407, 447, 448, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioners and informant are pattidars and there is pattidari land dispute between them. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32560 of 2022(2) dt.15-09-2022 3/3 learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 256 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T