Dhananjay Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17316 of 2017 ====================================================== Dhananjay Prasad Singh son of Kalanand Singh Resident of Village and P.O. - Madrauni Via - Naugachia, P.S. - Rengrachowk, District - Bhagalpur, at present Lecturer, Hanshi Mandal College, Bhagwat Nagar, Bihariganj, P.S. - Bihariganj, District - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 3.

The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Budha Marg, Patna. 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Pramandal, Saharsa. 5.

The District Education Officer, Madhepura.

6.

The Convenor-cum-Nominated Member of Ad-hoc-Committee of Hanshi Mandal College, Bhagwat Nagar, Biha 7.

The Principal-cum-Member Secretary, Ad-hoc-committee of Hanshi Mandal College, Bhagwat Nagar, Bihar 8.

Deepak Kumar Singh son of Yugeshwar Prasad Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Bihariganj, District - Madhepura at present Principal-cum-Member Secretary, Ad-hoc-committee of Hanshi Mandal College, Bhagat Nagar, Bihariganj, District - Madhepura. 9.

Pramod Mishra son of Naresh Mishra Ex-Principal, Hanshi Mandal College, Bhagat Nagar, Bihariganj, Madhepura at present residing at Gamail, P.O. and P.S. Bihariganj, District - Madhepura.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madanjit Kumar - Gp20 For the BSEB :

Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-State as well as learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and 3 are present.

2. By previous order dated 14.11.2025, this case was adjourned by way of last chance making it clear that if on the

Patna High Court CWJC No.17316 of 2017(4) dt.17-12-2025 2/2 next date, the petitioner is not interested in pressing the writ application, then the Court may consider dismissing it for nonprosecution. Today, again no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ application.

3. Hence the present writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U