Ajit Sah @ Ajeet Sah @ Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32520 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ajit Sah @ Ajeet Sah @ Ajeet Kumar S/o- Late Belash Sah R/v- Mahanagani Ps- Bettiah Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S. F.I.R. No. 14 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown miscreants have snatched the e-rickshaw of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of investigation, one Gaishul Azam was apprehended and he has given his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32520 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026 2/2 confessional statement. The petitioner is also alleged to have made a confessional statement. Learned counsel further submits that, save and except the confessional statements, there is no material against the petitioner. It is further submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 19.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of five cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah West Champaran in connection with Gopalpur P.S. F.I.R. No. 14 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T