Lalbabu Manjhi @ Lal Babu Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31635 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- Excise Mashrakh District- Saran ====================================================== Lalbabu Manjhi @ Lal Babu Manjhi S/o- Late Rambalak Manjhi VillageRepura PS-Madhoura District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ankur Prakash Sinha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mashrakh Excise P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 10 liters of illicit country-made liquor kept in the plastic bucket and bag from the bamboo orchard.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31635 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/3 recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern either with the seized liquor or the bamboo orchard. The recovery of the illicit liquor has been recovered from a open place which is accessible to one and all. There is a non-compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents and is languishing in judicial custody since 09.03.2025 without any rhymes or reason.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, stating that the petitioner has three criminal antecedents of similar nature of offence.
6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mashrakh Excise P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, subject to the following conditions; (i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31635 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 3/3 (ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T