Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33185/2022bail rejected

Harun Ansari @ Md. Harun v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-12Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33185 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2020 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka ====================================================== Harun Ansari @ Md. Harun S/O Md. Guljar @ Guljar Ansari R/O VillageNavtolia, P.S. And District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of commission of murder by shot fire as a result of which maternal uncle of the informant succumbed to injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is also submitted that there is no specific overt act of allegation levelled against the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33185 of 2022(3) dt.12-12-2022 2/2 In contra, learned APP vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in FIR and during investigation, witness has supported the prosecution version of the case. Postmortem report also supported the fact of the prosecution that cause of death was due to hemorrhagic shock due to fire arm injury. From perusal of the case diary, it appears that process of attachment to compel the appearance of the accused has already been executed. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner is accused in one other case under section 302 of IPC, apart from the present one. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) nirajkrs/- U T