Md. Aquib Jawed @ Md. Aquib v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.765 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Aquib Jawed @ Md. Aquib, aged about 22 years, Male, Son of Md. Jabir Hussain @ Md. Jabir resident of Village- Karim Nagar, P.O + P.S.- Mohiuddinnagar, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga 4.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Samastipur 6.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Patory, District- Samastipur 7.

The S.H.O, P.S.- Mohiuddinnagar, District- Samastipur. 8.

The S.H.O, Nawhatta Police Station, Saharsa ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, A.C. to A.A.G. III ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR) 14-05-2019 Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Singh, learned counsel, assisted by Sri Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, learned A.C. to A.A.G. No. III.

The present writ petition was filed against an order contained in Annexure- 5 i.e. Bihar Crime Control Case No. 56 of 2019 dated 17.04.2019 passed by District Magistrate,

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.765 of 2019(3) dt.14-05-2019 2/2 Samastipur, whereby the petitioner was directed to remain present in Nawhatta Police Station.

At the very outset, learned State Counsel has pointed out by way of referring to Annexure- 5 that writ petition has now become infructuous since the petitioner was directed to remain present in Nawhatta Police Station till 05.05.2019. Besides hearing, we have also perused the impugned order and after going through the same we are of considered opinion that the order impugned has lost its effect, and as such, there is no reason to pass any positive order. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) ( Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U T