Amod Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31879 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-462 Year-2017 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Amod Rai S/O Poshan Rai R/O Village- Adalpur, P.S- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali.
2.
Mithlesh Kumar Aryan @ Mithilesh Kumar Arya S/O Amod Rai R/O Village- Adalpur, P.S- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Hemant Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No.462 of 2017 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 504, 506, 324, 307, 353, 188, 333, 427, 379 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act read with Sections 4 and 40(8) of the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rule, 1972.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though it is a case of the year 2017, but he has no knowledge of the pendency of the case. Therefore, he could not moved before
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31879 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 the Court.
4. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and the Principal District and Sessions Judge has categorically acknowledged that it is a case of 2017 and from the lower court record, it transpires that under section 82 of the Cr.P.C., processes have already been issued against the petitioners and petitioners have been declared proclaimed offender.
5. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court finds that the anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. As such, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, therefore the bail application of the petitioners is hereby rejected.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T