Pramod Prasad Chaurasiya v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretarym,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.87 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23463 of 2019 ====================================================== Pramod Prasad Chaurasiya son of Sri Ramvilas Chaurasia resident of Village - Aroura, P.S. - Deo, District- Aurangabad.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

3.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

4.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Aurangabad. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Deo, Aurangabad. 6.

The Assistant Engineer, Deo, Aurangabad.

7.

The Junior Engineer, Deo, Aurangabad.

8.

The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat, Araura, Deo, Aurangabad. 9.

The Branch Manager, Madhya Gramin Bank, Bishunpur Chatti, Deo, Aurangabad.

10.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Aurangabad. 11.

Surendra Ram, the then Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Araura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Achok Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate Mr. Akshansh Ankit, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P.N. Shahi, A.A.G. 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 27-08-2021 This appeal is directed against the judgment dated

Patna High Court L.P.A No.87 of 2021(2) dt.27-08-2021 2/2 05.03.2020, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 23463 of 2019, titled as Pramod Prasad Chaurasiya Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors., by a learned Single Bench of this Court dismissing the writ petition. Confronted with the 2nd sentence of para 18 of the impugned order, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal, reserving liberty to seek review of the impugned judgment.

Permission granted.

Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/- U