Ranjeet Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30790 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2018 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
RANJEET SAHNI Son of Vishwanath Sahni, Resident of Village-Harpur Bhindi, P.S.-Tajpur, District-Samastipur.
2.
Gabbar Sahni @ Sanjeev Sahni Son of Vishwanath Sahni, Resident of Village-Harpur Bhindi, P.S.-Tajpur, District-Samastipur. 3.
Suta Sahni Son of Vishwanath Sahni, Resident of Village-Harpur Bhindi, P.S.-Tajpur, District-Samastipur.
4.
Raghuveer Sahni Son of Vishwanath Sahni, Resident of Village-Harpur Bhindi, P.S.-Tajpur, District-Samastipur.
5.
Bhubneshwar Sahni @ Bhunesh Sahni Son of Ram Sagarath Sahni, Resident of Village-Harpur Bhindi, P.S.-Tajpur, District-Samastipur. 6.
Naresh Sahni Son of Ram Sagarath Sahni, Resident of Village-Harpur Bhindi, P.S.-Tajpur, District-Samastipur.
7.
Chotu Sahni Son of Banke Sahni, Resident of Village-Harpur Bhindi, P.S.- Tajpur, District-Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar . .. ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Jain For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pancha Nand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 124 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 385 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The dispute arose on account of removal of the soil by J.C.B. machine. The driver was prevented and later on, the accused persons have assaulted by different manner. The injury
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30790 of 2019(2) dt.09-05-2019 2/2 report shows injury has been caused to the driver. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 124 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court. If the petitioners are found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of their bail bonds.
mkchy/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U T