Bihar Rajya Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Patna v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13329 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Bihar Rajya Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Patna through its President (Pradhan) Bhai Birendra having its registered office at Sri Munishwaranand Bhawan, Naya Tola, P.S. - Kadamkuan, Town and District - Patna. 2.

Bhai Birendra, Son of Late Rajendra Prasad Rai, Resident of Village and P.O. Mahinava, P.S. Maner, District - Patna.

3.

Ramendra Kumar Gupta, Son of Late Harish Chandra Prasad, resident of Village - Arya Sadan, Bibiganj Dalwar Road, P.O. - Danapur Cantt. P.S. Danapur, District - Patna, At present Secretary, Bihar Rajya Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director (Secondary Education), Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Education Officer, Patna.

4.

Sri Sanjeev Chaurasiya (MLA), Son of Ganga Prasad, Resident of Arya Bhawan, Khajpura, Bailey Road, P.S. Shashtri Nagar, Town and Dist. - Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the petitioners :

Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Pranav Kumar, Adv. With Mrs. Shrishti Singh, Adv.

For respondent no. 4 :

Mr. P.K. Sahi, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Mr.Vikas Kumar For the State :

Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw ( Gp23 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2023 Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly states that the order impugned has been withdrawn by the Government vide order dated 02.11.2022. Keeping in view thereto, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13329 of 2021(3) dt.09-01-2023 2/2 However, Learned Senior Counsel submits that the issues raised in the present petition requires to be adjudicated and should be left open to be examined in the connected case. Considering that the issues involved requires to be adjudicated, the writ petition is held to have become infructuous, but the issues is left open to be adjudicated in C.W.J.C. No. 16353 of 2022.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Pravinkumar/- Item No. 8.1 U