Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42701 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2019 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== ARUN KUMAR aged about 32 years Son of Surendra Yadav Resident of Village - Dhakjari, Ward No. 10, P.S. - Mansurchak, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Anil Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 379, 356,411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier prayer for bail of this petitioner was refused by this Court vide order dated 11.11.2020 as contained in Annexure 1 to the bail petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is in custody since 2.2.2020 till date even charge has not been framed. Petitioner has got clean antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody of the petitioner and the undue delay in trial, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42701 of 2021(2) dt.18-08-2021 2/2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsing Sarai, Samastipur in Dalsing Sarai Police Station Case No. 318 of 2019 on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T