Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42415 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2021 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== RAM YADAV Son of Upendra Yadav Resident of Village - Naya Tola, Jurabgaj, P.S.- Kodha, Distt.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-01-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course. The petitioner, who is in custody since 31.01.2021, seeks regular bail in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 68 of 2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 392/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that when the informant was coming out from PNB Bank after withdrawing Rs.5000/-, the petitioner snatched the bag of the informant containing Rs.5000/- and tried to flee away, but he was apprehended.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42415 of 2021(2) dt.24-01-2022 2/3 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner was a member of the crowd and he has been arrested merely on suspicion. He was forced to sign on the seizure list in police custody. The said money which is said to have been looted has already been handed over to the informant. Petitioner has clean antecedent and is in custody since 31.01.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 68 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42415 of 2021(2) dt.24-01-2022 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T