Rimjhim Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37074 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-728 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Rimjhim Kumari Daughter of Shivchandra Singh (As per complain case age of victim 17 years at the time of occurrence 08.11.2021), Resident of Village - Datuar, Ward No.- 13, P.S.- Khajauli, District - Madhubani.... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nagmani Singh @ Srinath Nagmani Singh Son of Late Jagdeo Singh 3.

Lav Kumar Singh Son of Srinath Nagmani Singh 4.

Kush Kumar Singh Son of Srinath Nagmani Singh 5.

Prince Kumar Singh @ Avanish Kumar Singh Son of Sushil Singh 6.

Bhim Singh @ Ravi Singh Son of Nawal Kishore Singh Babu 7.

Nawal Kishore Singh Son of Late Jagdeo Singh All Resident of Village - Datuar, P.S.- Khajauli, District - Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate : Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard Mr.Gagandeo Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 to 7 and Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for cancellation of bail bond of opposite party Nos. 2 to 7 they were granted privilege of anticipatory bail vide order dated 16.03.2024 passed in A.B.P.No.379/2024 by learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 728 of 2021.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37074 of 2024(4) dt.07-07-2025 2/2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the opposite party Nos.2 to 7 have obtained the privilege of anticipatory bail on 16.03.2024 concealing the fact that the anticipatory bail petition of opposite party Nos.2 to 7 has been rejected by the Patna High Court vide order dated 09.10.2023 passed in Cr.Misc.No.34285/2023. Thereafter, the petitioners have approached before the Hon'ble Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.14296/2023 and the same was dismissed and the opposite party Nos.2 to 7 have concealed the aforesaid fact and obtained the privilege of anticipatory bail by the learned court below.

4. The petitioner has not approached before the learned Trial Court for cancellation of bail bond of opposite party Nos.2 to 7.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to dispose of the present application with liberty to the petitioner to approach before the learned Trial Court.

6. Prayer is allowed.

7.Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T