Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31617 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2024 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar S/o- Tejan Yadav R/o- Mustichak Ps- Parasbigha DistJehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Paritosh Parimal For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(1), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 329(4), 109, 125(A), 125(B) and 74 of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that named accused persons entered his house and thereafter, caught his son Sonu and Upendra assaulted him by khanti causing injury on head, thereafter other accused persons assaulted other family members as detailed in the FIR. It is further alleged that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31617 of 2025(2) dt.16-05-2025 2/3
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner rather specific allegation of assaulting the son of the informant is against Upendra. It is further submitted that order impugned records that the seven persons were injured, out of whom, four persons received grievous injury on their hand and while rest injuries were opined to be simple in nature. It is further submitted that allegation of assault against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Alok Kumar, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Parasbigha P. S. Case No.268 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31617 of 2025(2) dt.16-05-2025 3/3
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T