Suman Kumari Keshri @ Suman Equbal And ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna And Or
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1318 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2015 Thana- JAGDIHSPUR District- Bhojpur ======================================================
1. Suman Kumari Keshri @ Suman Equbal W/o Shams Equbal @ Md. Danish D/o Awdhesh Pd. Keshri Resident of village and P.O. Jagdishpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur
2. Shams Equbal @ Md. Danish Son of Equbal Ahmad Resident of village / Mohalla- Jadishpur, Gali Mangri Chowk, Bari Masjid, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna
3. The Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur
4. The Officer-in-charge, Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur
5. Awadhesh Prasad Keshri son of Late Angai Prasad Keshri, Resident of village/Mohalla- Jagdishpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Namrata Mishra (Ga-13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 This writ application has been preferred in the year 2015 for the following reliefs:
(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the FIR which relates to Jagdishpur P. S. Case No. 257 of 2015 under Sections 365, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code which has been instituted to harass and humiliate the petitioner no. 2 and his family members who is legally wedded husband of petitioner no. 1.
(ii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1318 of 2015(3) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 commanding the respondent authority to provide Police protection since the life and liberty of the petitioners are in stake in the hand of private respondent who is very much after the life of the petitioners.
(iii) For issuance of any other writ/writs, order/orders, command/commands, direction/directions as your lordship may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. No one appears to press this writ application. Despite there being notice in the daily cause list requesting learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State to come prepared in old cases with information as to the present position and proceeding before the court below. Learned counsel for the State is present and submits that since final report has already been submitted in the present case during the pendency of the writ application, the relief prayed in the present writ application has become infructuous. In view of the submission made above, this writ application is disposed of having become infructuous. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T