Udai Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33156 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2022 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Udai Kumar Rai Son Of Dinesh Rai @ Dinesh Ray Resident Of VillageSadikpur Muraul, P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

It is a case of recovery of foreign liquor from beneath a Chowki and the motorcycle kept in the house of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail and submitted that seized wine was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33156 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 2/2 After considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T