Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30597/2019bail granted

Ramnath Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-08Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30597 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2018 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Patna ====================================================== RAMNATH SAHNI, aged about 20 years, Male Son of Motilal Sahni, Resident of Village - Jhikati, P.S.- Kurhani, Dist.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 54 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 68108 of 2018 which was rejected on 15.01.2019 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year in custody. Petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2018. Chargesheet has been submitted.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the observation made in order dated 15.01.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68108 of 2018, petitioner named above

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30597 of 2019(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M- 9th Patna, in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 54 of 2018 with following conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and valid reason trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T